Parliament Question: Targets under SCM

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3148 TO BE ANSWERED ON AUGUST 06, 2026 TARGETS UNDER SCM NO. 3148 SHRI GURMEET SINGH MEET HAYER:

Will the Minister of HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS be pleased to state:

(a) the original timeline, extensions granted and the final completion target date for the Smart Cities Mission (SCM);

(b) the details of the funds allocated, released and utilised under the Mission along with the capital raised through Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), State/UT-wise;

(c) the total number of the projects approved, completed and ongoing across the hundred Smart Cities including the names of cities with the highest completion rates;

(d) the details of the physical targets achieved with regard to Integrated Command and Control Centres (ICCCs), smart roads and safety networks; and

(e) the measures taken to ensure administrative stability and fixed tenures for Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) executives along with the details of local consultative meetings held with public representatives? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS (SHRI TOKHAN SAHU)

(a): Smart Cities Mission (SCM) was originally approved upto

31.03.2020 which was extended four times till 31.03.2025.

(b) and (c): Under SCM, as reported by the States/UTs as on

31.03.2026, a total 8,064 projects worth ₹1,64,811 Cr were taken up out of which 7,790 projects worth ₹1,56,257 Cr have been completed. Under SCM, out of Central Government’s allocation of ₹48,000 Cr, the cities have been able to claim Central Financial Assistance of ₹47,458 Cr (i.e. 99% of the total central share allocation for cities). As reported by the States/ UTs as on

31.03.2026, funds amounting to ₹46,377 Cr has been utilized (i.e.

98% of the total Central Financial Assistance released for cities). …2/--2- Under Public Private Partnership (PPP), a total 197 projects worth ₹9,277 Cr were taken up out of which 194 projects worth ₹9,190 Cr have been completed.

The State/UT-wise and city-wise details of projects along with central financial assistance claimed, utilised and the completion rate of project under SCM are enclosed as Annexure.

(d): Under the SCM, all 100 Smart Cities have established Integrated Command and Control Centres (ICCCs) and implemented various smart infrastructure systems such as Intelligent Traffic Management Systems (ITMS), CCTV Cameras, GPS-enabled waste collection vehicles, air quality sensors, emergency call boxes, and smart streetlights based on local requirements.

(e): Post closure of SCM on 31.03.2025, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) has issued Advisory No. 27 dated 10th June, 2025 to all States/ UTs. The Advisory has outlined the envisioned future role of SPVs of smart cities and a roadmap for the continued functioning of ICCCs. The advisory underscores repurposing of SPVs to meet emerging urban challenges. States and Union Territories, through their respective High-Powered Steering Committees (HPSCs) chaired by Chief Secretary, have been encouraged to chart out urban sector priorities and map areas where SPVs can continue to play a strategic role.

*****Annexure Annexure referred to in reply for part (b) and (c) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 3148 for answer on August 06, 2026 regarding Targets under SCM The State/UT-wise and city-wise details of projects along with central financial assistance claimed, utilised and the completion rate of project

under SCM: (Amount ₹Rs. Cr) Sl. City Name State Name Status of GoI Funds Total Projects Completed Projects Comple- No. GoI funds GoI funds No. of Cost of No. of Cost of tion Rate claimed utilized Projects Projects Projects Projects (in %) 1 Guwahati Assam 490 490 21 755 21 755 100% 2 Patna Bihar 488 485 34 1,430 34 1,430 100% 3 Chandigarh Chandigarh 490 490 97 2,694 97 2,694 100% 4 Atal Nagar Chhattisgarh 488 476 52 944 52 944 100% 5 Dahod Gujarat 417 414 36 984 36 984 100% 6 Rajkot Gujarat 490 490 71 2,184 71 2,184 100% 7 Surat Gujarat 490 490 87 2,694 87 2,694 100% 8 Vadodara Gujarat 490 489 52 1,943 52 1,943 100% 9 Ranchi Jharkhand 490 490 26 1,847 26 1,847 100% 10 Shivamogga Karnataka 490 490 112 1,381 112 1,381 100% 11 Tumakuru Karnataka 490 490 217 2,099 217 2,099 100% 12 Bhopal Madhya 490 490 82 2,791 82 2,791 100% Pradesh 13 Indore Madhya 490 490 231 3,751 231 3,751 100% Pradesh 14 Jabalpur Madhya 490 490 130 2,197 130 2,197 100% Pradesh 15 Pune Maharashtra 490 490 55 3,333 55 3,333 100% 16 Solapur Maharashtra 490 490 49 1,587 49 1,587 100% 17 Kohima Nagaland 490 477 40 689 40 689 100% 18 Udaipur Rajasthan 490 490 143 1,717 143 1,717 100% 19 Coimbatore Tamil Nadu 490 490 72 1,455 72 1,455 100% 20 Erode Tamil Nadu 490 486 55 1,304 55 1,304 100% 21 Madurai Tamil Nadu 490 490 16 1,900 16 1,900 100% 22 Salem Tamil Nadu 490 490 114 1,861 114 1,861 100% 23 Thoothukudi Tamil Nadu 490 482 75 1,038 75 1,038 100% 24 Tiruchirappalli Tamil Nadu 490 489 83 1,548 83 1,548 100% 25 Tirunelveli Tamil Nadu 490 480 81 1,817 81 1,817 100% 26 Tiruppur Tamil Nadu 490 489 28 2,833 28 2,833 100% 27 Agartala Tripura 490 490 77 808 77 808 100% 28 Agra Uttar Pradesh 490 490 62 2,369 62 2,369 100% 29 Bareilly Uttar Pradesh 490 485 88 1,476 88 1,476 100% 30 Jhansi Uttar Pradesh 490 490 78 1,868 78 1,868 100% 31 Kanpur Uttar Pradesh 490 489 91 3,060 91 3,060 100% 32 Moradabad Uttar Pradesh 490 490 41 1,503 41 1,503 100% 33 Varanasi Uttar Pradesh 490 490 117 3,342 117 3,342 100% 34 New Town West Bengal 490 487 226 1,460 225 1,435 99%Sl. City Name State Name Status of GoI Funds Total Projects Completed Projects Comple- No. GoI funds GoI funds No. of Cost of No. of Cost of tion Rate claimed utilized Projects Projects Projects Projects (in %) Kolkata 35 Ajmer Rajasthan 490 490 179 2,224 178 2,209 99% 36 Prayagraj Uttar Pradesh 490 489 146 2,295 145 2,250 99% 37 Davanagere Karnataka 490 490 128 1,976 127 1,947 99% 38 Saharanpur Uttar Pradesh 490 489 115 1,292 114 1,245 99% 39 Thanjavur Tamil Nadu 490 488 103 996 102 989 99% 40 Lucknow Uttar Pradesh 490 490 103 2,126 102 2,115 99% 41 Kota Rajasthan 490 484 87 2,154 86 2,139 99% 42 Jaipur Rajasthan 490 484 170 2,545 168 2,483 99% 43 Shimla Himachal 488 478 211 896 208 840 99% Pradesh 44 Ahmedabad Gujarat 490 490 70 2,655 69 2,626 99% 45 Raipur Chhattisgarh 453 453 342 1,745 337 1,696 99% 46 Jammu Jammu and 489 459 127 2,969 125 2,940 98% Kashmir 47 Bengaluru Karnataka 488 456 57 1,054 56 1,031 98% 48 Nashik Maharashtra 444 444 53 3,197 52 3,026 98% 49 Vellore Tamil Nadu 490 489 53 2,096 52 2,083 98% 50 Aligarh Uttar Pradesh 490 490 52 1,830 51 1,730 98% 51 Panaji Goa 490 470 51 1,051 50 1,043 98% 52 Kochi Kerala 490 490 98 1,761 96 1,734 98% 53 Chennai Tamil Nadu 490 490 49 1,104 48 1,097 98% 54 Ujjain Madhya 490 490 95 1,613 93 1,589 98% Pradesh 55 Belagavi Karnataka 490 490 217 2,780 212 2,722 98% 56 Gandhinagar Gujarat 490 463 43 1,046 42 846 98% 57 Hubballi- Karnataka 490 444 81 1,950 79 1,835 98% Dharwad 58 Srinagar Jammu and 452 452 161 3,634 157 3,532 98% Kashmir 59 Sagar Madhya 490 489 80 1,782 78 1,607 98% Pradesh 60 Thiruvanantha Kerala 488 488 79 1,242 77 1,179 97% puram 61 Rourkela Odisha 490 490 75 1,517 73 1,370 97% 62 Dehradun Uttarakhand 490 484 33 1,144 32 939 97% 63 Visakhapatna Andhra 490 479 65 1,695 63 1,613 97% m Pradesh 64 Bhubaneswar Odisha 490 490 32 2,072 31 2,057 97% 65 Gangtok Sikkim 488 447 29 744 28 735 97% 66 Satna Madhya 490 483 86 1,363 83 1,262 97% Pradesh 67 Gwalior Madhya 490 490 84 1,633 81 1,416 96% Pradesh 68 Bhagalpur Bihar 490 486 27 1,504 26 1,494 96% 69 Dharamshala Himachal 490 477 80 656 77 611 96% Pradesh 70 Thane Maharashtra 490 490 52 1,712 50 1,402 96% 71 Pimpri- Maharashtra 490 490 25 1,304 24 1,172 96% ChinchwadSl. City Name State Name Status of GoI Funds Total Projects Completed Projects Comple- No. GoI funds GoI funds No. of Cost of No. of Cost of tion Rate claimed utilized Projects Projects Projects Projects (in %) 72 Aurangabad Maharashtra 490 490 47 2,835 45 2,690 96% 73 Amritsar Punjab 490 484 44 1,911 42 1,805 95% 74 Pasighat Arunachal 490 486 43 512 41 458 95% Pradesh 75 NDMC Delhi 343 317 127 997 121 884 95% 76 Jalandhar Punjab 490 445 78 1,186 74 1,023 95% 77 Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 429 403 126 1,765 118 1,605 94% 78 Biharsharif Bihar 433 418 61 1,449 57 1,252 93% 79 Mangaluru Karnataka 490 457 105 2,579 98 2,484 93% 80 Namchi Sikkim 490 464 26 917 24 781 92% 81 Ludhiana Punjab 490 490 82 1,389 74 1,320 90% 82 Karnal Haryana 490 432 117 1,207 105 801 90% 83 Tirupati Andhra 392 388 104 2,083 92 1,649 88% Pradesh 84 Puducherry Puducherry 343 338 80 595 70 328 88% 85 Kakinada Andhra 490 485 92 1,908 80 1,731 87% Pradesh 86 Muzaffarpur Bihar 490 445 30 860 26 747 87% 87 Greater Telangana 377 377 119 1,800 103 1,499 87% Warangal 88 Imphal Manipur 398 348 27 513 23 346 85% 89 Nagpur Maharashtra 490 490 47 1,768 40 1,588 85% 90 Kalyan- Maharashtra 490 490 19 1,245 16 721 84% Dombivali 91 Diu Daman and Diu 386 386 52 1,148 43 1,093 83% 92 Karimnagar Telangana 429 429 49 1,094 40 1,022 82% 93 Faridabad Haryana 490 490 44 929 35 763 80% 94 Itanagar Arunachal 488 409 32 521 25 422 78% Pradesh 95 Shillong Meghalaya 490 445 13 517 10 453 77% 96 Amaravati Andhra 488 488 19 903 14 746 74% Pradesh 97 Aizawl Mizoram 490 431 45 508 33 290 73% 98 Kavaratti Lakshadweep 183 45 12 289 8 11 67% 99 Port Blair Andaman 306 245 18 511 9 72 50% Nicobar Islands 100 Silvassa Dadra and 392 389 29 853 14 432 48% Nagar Haveli Total 47,320 46,254 8,064 1,64,811 7,790 1,56,257 97% Non-Selected 18 18 Smart Cities Sultanpur Lodhi 120 105 Grand Total 47,458 46,377 (As reported by the States/ UTs/ Smart Cities Mission as on 31.03.2026)